The controversies generated around the figures of Sigmund Freud and Carl Gustav Jung are innumerable and often controversial, in this article we will talk about the main differences between Freud and Jung.
In general, for each of your proposals, we find specialists who are for and against each with their own variants, and when instead of analyzing them separately they are put at the same level, the comparison greatly enriches the discussions.
- The differences between Freud and Jung are interesting because.
- Paradoxically.
- At the beginning of Jung’s professional practice they agreed on reflections and theoretical approaches; in fact.
- The initial coincidence means that.
- In some cases.
- We have doubts about the author of a certain idea; something that no longer happens.
- For example.
- In the latter stages of its evolution.
- When its differences have increased and its brand has become much more special.
- One way or another.
- The tour we offer for the history of these two great authors seems truly incredible.
- Would you like to come with us?.
Sigmund Freud was a neurologist of Austrian origin who initiated and shaped one of the most powerful and traditional psychological currents: psychoanalysis; in addition, he is considered by many, both followers and critics, as one of the most important intellectuals of the twentieth century. neurologist, his initial interest as a field of study was neurology; from there, we can trace the origin of its evolution, gradually moving towards a more psychological aspect: both in the analysis of the causes, in the course and in the consequences of the disorders he studied.
On the other hand, Carl Gustav Jung was a psychiatrist, psychologist and essayist of Swiss origin. He acted as a key figure in the early days of psychoanalysis; he later founded his own school of “analytical psychology”, also known as deep psychology or complex psychology.
Jung became interested in Freud’s work, which led him to name him his “successor”. Publicly,However, it was not long before the teachers of Vienna and Zurich, because of their theoretical and personal inconveniences, separated, so Jung was expelled from the International Psychoanalytic Society of the time, the same one he presided over in 1910.
While there are many differences between Freud and Jung, in this article we will mention some of the most relevant; on the other hand, we can divide these differences into different subdivisions.
Isn’t it strange to hear the term, though? Jungian psychoanalyst – referring to those who have studied Jung’s theory – is a mistake of words. Jung is not considered a psychoanalyst, in fact he decided to completely separate himself from this school and founded his own.
Freud recognized and granted Jung authorship of this term. Freud used this term always accompanied by a surname in his theory:?Oedipus Complex? O?Castration complex?To explain the sexual theory and psychic dynamics that exist there.
On the other hand, for Jung, the complex term is linked to all concepts or images with emotional charge that act as a divided personality. At the heart of these complexes is the archetype, which is linked to the concept of trauma.
Jung attached great importance to the parapsychology and authenticity of so-called “hidden phenomena”. Freud, for his part, opposed the study of these subjects and linked them to psychoanalysis; thought they would do the theory very badly.
“If two people still agree on everything, I can assure you that one of them thinks for both of them. “Sigmund Freud
For Freud, he? Archaic remains relate to certain unconscious subjects, would be related to the concept of ménmal trait created by him.
For Jung, on the other hand, archaic remains were more than that; In fact, did they allow you to create a different typology from the unconscious of psychoanalysis?the collective unconscious. To do this, he used the analysis of his patients’ dreams, interpreted different myths produced by different cultures and added them to the research of alchemical symbolism.
For Jung, the collective unconscious is common to human nature. formed by archetypal structures derived from humanity’s most transcendent emotional moments that result in ancestral fear of darkness, the idea of God, the good, the demonic, among others.
For Freud, in both the development of neurosis and psychosis, each individual’s historical factors outweigh current factors or circumstances, i. e. historical factors would determine present and future behaviors.
However, for Jung, it worked backwards. It relativizes the pre-eminence of historical factors in the Freudian foundation, and although Freud did not agree with this particularity, he did so in general terms, considering Jung’s emphasis on highlighting the present in the field of neurosis at the expense of the past. .
“I’m not what happened to me, I’m what I chose to become. -Carl Jung-
For Jung, the concept of libido has defined a general vital energy that has taken the most important form for the body at every moment of its biological evolution: diet, elimination, sex. It is different from the Freudian concept of libido: mainly sexual energy concentrated in different areas of the body during the psychosexual development of the individual.
For Freud, the psychic structure consisted of three levels: conscious, preconscious and unconscious. For Jung, there was the conscious level, but he referred to two unconsciouss: the personal unconscious and the collective unconscious.
Another difference between Freud and Jung is the way they understood the phenomenon of transference, both have considered this concept. Freud thought that for this to happen, there would have to be some asymmetry in which the analyst serves as an object, a blank canvas that the patient can place? Transfer of fantasies, representative figures, etc. , from where the analysis work begins. One-way direction.
On the other hand, if for Jung the transfer remains the central problem of analysis, he does not share his orthodox practice, because from his knowledge of alchemy he would define the therapeutic relationship from the metaphor of two different chemical bodies that, when brought into contact, change. Thus, the relationship between the patient and the psychotherapist is a relationship of collaboration and mutual confrontation.
For Freud, the use of the sofa tool was essential to be able to perform analysis, always leaving the analyst out of the sight of the patient, the opposite of Jung, who performed the sessions face to face, sitting in front of the patient and now a constant direct interaction. He pushed the couch away.
The frequency of sessions is another difference between Freud and Jung. Carl Gustav Jung saw his patients at first, twice a week, for one hour per session, and then proposed moving on to a weekly session as part of a routine three-year treatment. Freud, for his part, treated his patients six times a week, 45 to 50 minutes in each session, strictly.
Finally, although we mention ten differences between Freud and Jung and their methods, thoughts and approaches, there are many others. The relationship between them and the way each of them left its mark on the other is very interesting; therefore, he is invited to learn more about his works.