Some people, faced with low self-esteem, often boast of attributing false personal virtues, showing values and trying to get attention every time they have the opportunity, what happens is that they often point out what they lack behind the scenes, they are people who develop great styles of behavior.
As a result, they end up being rejected because they become self-regulators who leave no room for others.
- Devaluation or low self-esteem is one of the greatest evils of the human being.
- Good self-esteem means becoming valued.
- Loved.
- Prioritized.
- And moving away from selfishness and self-centeredness.
It is also about understanding one’s own limitations and capabilities, it is about what can and cannot be done, what are the strengths, resources and weaknesses, in short, recognizing us in a comprehensive and sincere way.
However, appreciation is a process that occurs internally in our minds and emotions; it is a process of self-reflection that explores both its own virtues and its flaws.
We must only value ourselves: reflecting on our personal values, making ourselves and others precious, because if we do, we will offer others the best of us.
Is this true appreciation far from ostentatious to wildlife, is this group made up of proud, proud, false, humble and modest, overrated, self-centered, pretececious, petulant?Some specimens of the genus that try, in different ways, to be recognized. and defend against his strong sense of inferiority.
They are forms of interaction that generate reactions in different contexts, mechanisms that involve personal inferiority, in which the following equation could be applied: tell me what you boast about and I will tell you what you are suffering.
Those who presume consciously believe that they can do anything, but it is not good self-esteem, it is egocentrism, that is, self-idolatry, is obviously closer to pedantism and pride, although this may well be typical. delusional behavior.
They are omnipotent authoritarians who try to hoard the dialogues, attributing a small outburst to them, and are absolutely “involved”. In your dialogues, are they monologues? We heard, “why me, ” on one occasion I do, do you know me?, although the caller talks about a topic.
Braggers are omnipotent, but they’re not in their actions, they don’t have the ability they claim to have, they say they can do anything, but they don’t do it when it comes to doing it.
In pride, the human being, in addition to feeling omnipotent, overestimates and deploys what he considers his personal values, behaves with pride, in an attitude that devalues the other.
The touters think they know everything and have an asymmetrical position, placing themselves above each other with their chins subtly raised which forces them to look down, they speak as if it were a university essay.
There are also pretentious people with a touch of pedantry. For example, the pretentious is what grabs attention in social talks, carrying out various cases.
They usually read small, shallow curiosity articles in popular magazines or decorate some Discovery Channel news.
In addition, they continually speak seductively, without giving time to others, and sometimes it is ridiculous to try to show technical construction knowledge to an engineer, explain the unconscious mechanisms to the psychologist, teach quantum physics to the physicist or the mechanisms of cloning the biologist, teach international politics, marine biology and even give an analysis of the present day.
However, these are not indicators of wisdom, but ways to stand out in social gatherings.
This is one of the superb behavioral styles that could be mitigated with levels of humility, even the person could be truly admired.
You can hardly describe these people as proud. Precisely because the word pride is a term misused in common use. In general, it’s treated as synonymous with pride: “You’re proud, who you think you are!And nothing is more false than that.
Being proud of yourself is the best thing that can happen to a person, it is synonymous with an ideal and productive valuation. That’s not to say that someone is superior to another, it’s not a measure that belittles the other; it’s a personal estimate of what it’s worth.
Pride doesn’t mean overestimating either. To overestimate yourself is to give you more courage than you have. Overrated he thinks he’s someone when he’s not, as such, it’s a defensive position that hides feelings of internal devaluation.
For example, a person cannot find work because they want to work as a boss or manager, without having work experience, even in theory, is convinced that they meet the requirements of this position and believes that another lower position lowers it. it doesn’t suit you and doesn’t meet your criteria.
He thinks that if he takes a position at a lower level than he aspires to, he connects with the ineptitude he neither wants nor wants to be aware of, so he prefers not to work to accept his devaluation, they end up blaming the country. social and economic policy and rely on the excuse of not being able to find work.
The humble, on the other hand, are those who do not boast of their knowledge and abilities, many of them recognize that they do, but do not go through life reminding people of their virtues.
It is these people who surprise us with their abilities, because we never thought they had them, they are like a Pandora’s box from which resources and resources emerge that do not correspond to the discreet style in which they appear.
Thus, the humble are very different from those who act with false modesty.
Falsely modest people are people who intentionally show a profile of humility, try to be the interlocutor to show off and highlight the conditions they try to hide to make them stand out.
In other words, it is not the protagonist who flaunts, it is the communication partner who reveals what he supposedly does not want to show.
Individuals in this category have a particular way of bragging, are neither arrogant nor petulant, are modest egocentric: they show an aspect of disability that leaves room for the other to realize that they are capable, and aspire to have their interlocutor reveal their potential.
Anyone who has these great styles of behavior is almost perfect, but secretly expects to find value in their relationships and will never accept that it has flaws or errors.
They are also not encouraged to give or help others receive recognition. As with any defensive mechanism of omnipotence, personal feelings of helplessness and internal devaluation that do not emerge clearly prevail among the proud.
The sense of autonomy is very important in this style of personality, people who behave magnificently in human interactions are far above others, are always asymmetrical and look at others from above, so it is difficult for the interlocutors to reach the hearts of these demigods.
Almost always, when they connect with others, they do so through the intellectual or the rational. They can monopolize an encounter by taking the initiative to monologize and receive praise and appreciation from those around them.
These forms of ostentation can be learned very quickly. As noted above, listen to feedback from those who really know or collect data on the few existing cultural television shows and skillfully develop through oratory.
These perfects are, as such, de-golds. Omnipotence, in general, is a defensive device combined with denial. It is necessary to deny these aspects that show impotence and insecurity and, as if by magic, form an omnipotent and self-confident character.
Obviously, this structure is not conscious. This is not a premeditated act, it is gradually being built, increasingly hiding the dark feelings that bring out the weaknesses of the person.
However, sooner or later, these mechanisms cause the person to be gradually rejected. Initially, the omnipotent can be eloquent with empathy and stand out among its interlocutors, for example, in the development of specific problems.
As this attitude is repeated in all subjects and on all occasions, people begin to dislike the protagonist and attitudes of rejection appear. It is a directly proportional equation: by force of distinguishing itself, with so much marginalization, it has just been devalued.