The emotional coercion to which immediacy technologies, such as WhatsApp, subject us removes the principles of good communication, it is common to find several conflicts with people who require some fluency in conversation.
We don’t have to answer, but we’re morally obliged to. You end up burning us? And make our contact with others a real odyssey.
- Therefore.
- It is good to develop these technological rights and enforce our desires.
- To persist in fulfilling the expectations of others ends up exhausting us.
- Intoxicating us and destroying our identity.
Who has never felt questioned by the way he responds to the messages, who has not been pressured or has not been the victim of the haste of others, who did not feel that social media was ending his intimacy?
We have the right not to answer if we do not want to, or, in your opinion, to do so when it suits us best. Likewise, we have the right to post whatever we want on our social networks. There are several examples on the network of people who have decided to take a break and leave the world of WhatsApp and other apps to lighten their lives and give themselves some peace.
With this attitude she became criticized and questioned by many people. Doesn’t respond mean being one? Antisocial or unre consideration, as many want to make us believe, we are simply making use of our rights.
We must not yield to the tyranny of new technologies, because it lets our own will die.
What we discussed in this article does not affect everyone equally, in fact, psychological vulnerability depends to a large extent on the characteristics of the personality or emotional states that define the person at that time.
In this regard, research has emerged to explain the dependence and inadequate treatment of new technologies, which point to profiles defined by:
It is therefore understandable that people who are highly dependent on technology and, therefore, pressure through networks, have certain characteristics of those mentioned above, so, at this stage, it should be remembered that social pressure is a learned subject and that the need for permanent contact with others promotes a perception of totally subjective proximity.
That’s why it’s critical to analyze that and remember that if someone doesn’t respond doesn’t mean they don’t like us or don’t want to relate to us, a person who doesn’t respond to WhatsApp can sleep, watch TV, read a book, eat, breathe or just live.
You may not like to answer it or you don’t consider it necessary. That’s why we shouldn’t worry or judge her. That is not to say that they give us more or less importance; the healthiest reading about it is that others are free people with rights. We can all decide whether or not they want to be slaves to technology.
We have no obligation to be accessible or available to have a conversation at any time, so it is good to maintain control over our own lives and not allow social media to monitor our lives, if we think about it and set the limits we want in a strong way, we will be overwhelmed by a wonderful sense of emotional freedom.