Did the witty and talented actor and comedian Grouxo Marx immortalize this phrase?These are my principles. If I don’t like it, do I have others?He was a great comedian who, with his indirect comics, said what he wanted, who hurts, so using signals to make people laugh may seem funny, and that’s usually the case.
No entanto, elas podem se transformar em um problema quando estão fora de contexto e queremos transmitir uma mensagem importante. De fato, nestes contextos nos quais o conteúdo da comunicação é especialmente relevante, nós costumamos utilizar as indiretas porque não nos sentimos suficientemente seguros para compartilhar a mensagem de forma direta.
- He thinks that if indirects are not used properly and in the right context.
- They can actually cause harm.
- By using language in a distorted and manipulated way.
- We can bring a sentimental relationship to ruin; or any other kind of relationship that is.
- But that is important to us.
If you look at the literal definition of “indirect”, we can summarize it as an expression that is used to prevent its board, but is not said accurately and clearly. This is the most accepted meaning.
In other words, indirect ones can be fun or not. If we look at Professor James K. McNulty’s study, the bottom line is that high expectations lead to a good number of relationships that don’t have a solid connection to ruin.
What is the relationship between the indirect study and McNulty’s?According to the researcher, high expectations in marriage or relationships create personal and marital dissatisfaction, triggering a number of really negative attitudes towards communication.
The marital dissatisfaction of the study leads us to some conclusions, such as the desirability of being direct in demanding changes in one relationship, we must be clear whether we want to increase the other person’s motivation.
However, through the use of clues and provocations, according to McNulty, we are leaving the field for indirect hostility and sarcasm to take over the relationship, creating an atmosphere in which disapproval is installed, eliminating the possibility of resolving conflicts. .
In reality, excessive keys are a failure in the channels of communication between the couple, it is an excellent ground for silence, contempt, aggression and lack of verbal and nonverbal language, an evil that, according to the study, affects a large number of union people.
Other researchers have gone much further in studying the problem of indirect use. Anthropologist Gregory Bateson considered in his 1956 publications that the “two-way message,” as he considered “provocations,” when over-repeated, can even lead to anxiety disorders and even schizophrenia.
By this I do not mean that we cannot use indirectly in our usual communication, in fact, it does not have to be pathological. We can do this in a possible way, but always considering that we are putting a veil on our communication, which can make it difficult to transmit the message.
There are, of course, sensible ways to establish the logical use of the indirect. Let’s look at some ideas from mcNulty’s studio, Bateson or coach Victor Pacheco, who is also working on this topic:
“The devil is not the prince of matter, the devil is the pride of the spirit, faith without smile, the truth that is never riddled with doubts. ?Umberto Eco-
Remember to use the indirect in a moderate way, knowing the area in which you are and putting limits in common with the other person, otherwise you could create a climate that, in a few months, leads to the end of the relationship. Is that what you want?