Slavoj? Ek is a Slovenian philosopher, psychoanalyst and sociologist who has gained great notoriety around the world thanks to his deep and developed perspective of contemporary reality. He uses new and ingenious language to explain his postures, which has given him recognition and prestige in “showcase culture”.
The “I” Ek approaches combine the principles of dialectical materialism with Lacanian psychoanalysis. Its intention is to explain today’s popular culture. He denounces the ideological pitfalls of power and its manifestations, seeking to open awareness to the understanding of new realities, and also does so simply and without losing his sense of humor.
- “I am neither naive nor utopian; I know there won’t be a big revolution.
- However.
- Useful things can be done.
- Such as indicating system limitations.
- ?Slavoj? Ⅰ? Ek-.
One of the most interesting aspects of Slavoj? Ek is that he uses film and literature to explore his ideas. In particular, he frequently used the films of Alfred Hitchcock and David Lynch. He also cites Shakespeare, Kafka or Lenin naturally.
“i?ek is an anti-system philosopher. His thinking proposes and promotes an attitude of resistance to consumption and market deprivation. He is also a declared enemy of political and religious fundamentalisms. Some classify him as an anarchist, but in reality he is above all a scathing critic of the present time. Here are some of your most interesting statements.
Do it seem that some ways of being are being promoted now?Do not touch life, as this extraordinary reflection points out: “It seems that at all levels we are increasingly living a life without substance. If you consume non-alcoholic beer, fat-free meat, caffeine-free coffee and possibly virtual sex?without sex ?.
In this text, “I” Ek describes this current position of rejecting all “negatives” very well, as if each reality did not involve benefits and damages. Absolutely everything implies loss and gain, even these aseptic postures. to be on the brink of “evil”, is just a childish paranoia.
For “I” Ek, the individual is largely determined by his environment, so it is difficult to recognize whether his thoughts and actions were born of himself or are the result of structural influence. In that sense, he emphasizes, “You can” don’t change people, but you can change the system so that people don’t have to do certain things. “
The statement is intended to emphasize that many behaviors are induced by the system of relationships, values and beliefs in which an individual develops, so, in order to induce certain personal changes, it is also necessary to transform the context.
Power acts in different ways on people. It is the same power that induces an attitude of passivity or indifference in certain human beings. This is reflected in the phrase: “Doing nothing is not empty, it has a meaning: to say yes to the existing. relationships of domination. “
This can be applied to both everyday situations and great social events. Not acting, not actively intervening, is a way of accepting prevailing conditions, and those conditions are imposed by power, according to perpetuation.
The same goes for individual intimacy, who remains passive due to a family mandate or the inner circle, is the manifestation of totalitarianism in private life, who feels that he has nothing to do, even if he does not realize it, obeys another.
Slavoj? Ek distances hes hese from the romantic vision of love. On the contrary, it gives it a painful role: “Love is lived as a great shame, a monstrous parasite, a permanent state of emergency that ruins small pleasures. “
This statement is not a rejection of love, nor a call not to experience it, but a complaint. Love, on the one hand, gives satisfaction, but on the other hand it also breaks, breaks the individual inside. This is not negative, but simply natural for humans.
?i?ek says not to be afraid of failed attempts. The worst failure may not be to try, as explained in this sentence: “After failure, it is possible to move forward and fail better; on the contrary, indifference plunges us more and more into the swamp of stupidity ?.
The attempt, even if it is a failure, always allows for improvement. You learn, you grow up. On the other hand, if you fall into a passive and indifferent position, the opposite happens: decay, decay, total stagnation. Passivity is the death of consciousness.
History has been dominated by the great systems of thought, which have been considered universal. We are now at a different time, as stated here: “Even in the political arena, we must not aspire to systems that explain everything and projects of global emancipation. Should the violent imposition of large solutions give way to specific forms of intervention and resistance?
The systems of thought that claim universality have neglected many peculiarities; in fact, they have often been imposed violently. Now is the time to look for what sets us apart, not what unifies us.
This wonderful text of “I” Ek denounces today a palpable reality: “We are trapped in unhealthy competition, an absurd network of comparisons with others. Do we pay enough attention to what makes us feel good because we’re obsessed with whether we have more or less fun than others?
We are at a time when more than ever we have undergone a social sanction or approval, many define their actions and valuations based on comparison with others.
In this case, it is not a question of finding what satisfies them personally, but of measuring whether this gratification is greater or lesser than the others, what produces happiness is overcoming others, rather than feeling a sense of personal realization and personal realization.
Philosophy is not currently a knowledge oriented to the revelation of great truths. In the eyes of “I” Ek, his role is more to question and open “absolute truths. “This is reflected in this sentence: “Philosophy finds no solutions, but raises questions. Your main task is to correct the questions.
At a time when uncertainty predominates, philosophy contributes more by asking than answering, deep and precise questions bring us closer to more precise answers, in that sense we may not have found the right questions, that is the goal to which philosophy should point. .
The agents of the? Revealed truths do far more harm than good. They encourage the maintenance of absolutist or totalitarian ideas that only lead to new forms of slavery. That’s why “I” Ek stresses, “We don’t need prophets, but leaders to encourage us to use freedom. “
The role of the contemporary leader is to help others freely define their path, not blindly follow in the footsteps of a man or a group. A true leader fosters the autonomy of those he leads. It encourages everyone to be leaders for themselves.
Slavoj? Ek is one of the great thinkers of our time, his reflections help to understand a world that has become very complex and sometimes seems erratic, it is certainly a must-have source of reference for anyone looking to calibrate his compass in the times we live in. .