Chess is a wonderful game because the end result depends very little on the luck and much of the experience of both players. The winner knows that he may have lost and that the difference was in what he did; the loser knows he could have won and that the difference was also due to his movements. Thus, in chess, as in many other challenges, there is a mistake, but not a failure, much less a failure.
There are mistakes because there are always strategies that can be improved, especially if we look at them from the perspective of someone who has just handed over their king’s head. I could have played better. However, his defeat is far from a failure, as in the next game he will receive many of the blows he has learned. In this sense, their time investment was profitable, probably much more than that of the winner.
- The winner barely returns home thinking about the game.
- His strategies have been strengthened and.
- As a result.
- He is unlikely to have found any reason to question them.
- So he will surely repeat them until someone wins.
- In this sense victory tends to perpetuate the cycle.
- To reduce the investment.
- So it is so soft.
- Our brain wants to save energy and victory is often misleading support in this regard.
Failure occurs when what has happened, beyond the taste of defeat, does not bring us anything, especially in the games where it commands, that is why they are so poor humanly, because the one who loses (which can happen to many). sometimes, since the bank has the probability in its favor: this relentless law when we talk about many games and many players), learns little, but we cling to a disturbing superstition.
“Getting in before nine didn’t make me lose,” “This shirt was bad for me,” “I don’t come with Joo anymore because I don’t win any?You?).
Let’s leave out the irony. Luck doesn’t have much to teach us/remember, apart from what happens in the present.
The loser is not the one who takes one failure after another, nor the one who has just failed, failed is an adjective (tag) that has connotations that go far beyond that, say that someone is a failure or think that we are a failure. permeates the whole being, it is part of the nature of the person. So we’re talking about something immutable.
This is not going to change and therefore assumes a sentence for the future. Eliminate motivation to learn. He sends us the following message: “No matter what you learn, you’ll never win. “Whoever feels a loser will be unfairly deterministic about his future, as well as the one who puts that label on the other who unfairly ends up believing it.
Yes, perhaps the past is the best predictor of the future, but never the voice that dictates his speeches to the writer. There is no determinism, but the possibility of overcoming rooted in change. That’s why we’re also attracted to the same, excess that scares us.
That’s why this attraction breaks down in the person who feels a failure, as if thought were watery, porous and as if he were nailed deep into his being.
Thus, this thought serves as a trigger and support for many depressions. A depression that appears when hope is broken (Abramson et al. , 1997), not that the future is different, but that we can do something to project it.
Therefore, there are mental problems, such as phobias, that lead to depression: anxiety is what drowns out this hope of control, emphasizing that we are certainly vulnerable beings.