Have you ever heard of the transfer of emotions?We are in a football match, 44 minutes after the start of the second period. It’s a minute away. Corinthians beat Palmeiras one by zero. A player from Gavio’s team tries to prevent a Palmeirense player from entering the area and falling.
The referee beeps the penalty and Corinthians players start arguing with the referee, some seem very angry. A piggy pushes another from the Corinthians and he strikes back. The judge is obliged to raise two red and several yellow cards. What’s going on? They are all victims of the emotion transfer paradigm.
- It is very common to encounter situations in which someone reacts a little or quite disproportionately to a stimulus that.
- At first.
- Would not have much intrinsic meaning.
- We have often received very unpleasant responses from relatives or acquaintances without having done anything about it.
- He deserves them for me.
On several occasions, however, there is no intention or pretence of the comment or behavior to harm the other, in addition, we can see that such events are more likely to occur at the end of the day What is going on?Why is this happening? Read on and find out.
Dolf Zillmann developed the paradigm of transferring arousal from the theory of arousal, which was created by Stanley Schachter. According to this author, arousal is equivalent to physiological activation. While this is a much more complex and extensive theory than that, this brief description is enough to understand the Zillmann paradigm we want to explain.
According to Zillmann, physiological activation does not end abruptly when the conditions that caused it are no longer present, in fact, it takes much longer to disappear because the hormonal processes underlying them are slow.
That is, if a person has been activated in a certain context, and immediately afterwards is in another context and this also causes emotion, this second activation adds to that generated in the first context, this situation is what is called residual excitation, that is, the degree of activation that is carried from one context to another.
When we bring the emotion from context A to context B, we usually attribute it incorrectly and only to context B.
If our working day is too heavy, and at the last minute our superior entrusts us with another task even if we know that we don’t have time to finish it, could our reaction be very angry and could burst in front of it?Even if we don’t do it most of the time. We will attribute all our frustration to the last task that our boss has just entrusted to us.
Do not have an attitude with the fury of passion; Would it be the equivalent of going to sea in the middle of a storm?. – Thomas Fuller-
If the boss’s task had been entrusted to us first thing in the morning, we would surely have done it without problems, because we still wouldn’t have accumulated any kind of physiological reaction, or maybe yes, depending on the day until which it was missing. we got to work.
In this way, the paradigm of the transfer of emotion may or may not be fulfilled, depending on how we were that day or that period of time.
So, before responding to someone angry or angry, it is best to let them pass for a few minutes and try to relax as much as possible, this is because many times, saying popularly, we can be ‘hot’ and anything can be the last spark to generate fire. “Doesn’t it even come that today I’m terrible?” when someone tells us that, it’s better not to go at all.
In 1971, Zillmann conducted an experiment on the effect of watching movies with different emotional content on aggressive behavior, which was developed in three different stages:
Zillmann hoped that those who had seen erotic and aggressive films would deliver more intense electric shocks to the “enemy” than those who had seen neutral films. The result showed that participants who watched the film with violent content managed more intense downloads than after watching the film with neutral content, and those who watched the erotic film administered more intense downloads than the aggressive film.
Based on the theory of Zillmann, Scott C. ‘s research team. Bunce conducted an experiment on the transfer of arousal in 1993. One of the main findings was that extroverts reacted worse to unpleasant stimuli.
The reason, according to the authors, is that those with higher scores on this personality trait seem to enjoy less negative experiences in their environment, so they should try harder to process information about unpleasant experiences.
Research to date on the excitation transfer paradigm shows that activation changes are not adequately attributed to the actual events that trigger them. situations that have gradually increased activation.
“If you’re angry, think about the consequences” – Confucius-
The results also suggest that reactions and actions are not supported by the direct relationship between perceived arousal and its causal history. This effect highlights the relevance of physiological arousal in modulating emotional intensity and confirms the idea that it is undifferentiated, that is, not specific.