In today’s society, where almost everything is done with other people, leadership has become a fundamental skill, so it is important to analyze the main types of leadership and their influence in our environment.
Many psychologists have studied this concept and, among them, the figure of Daniel Goleman, a psychologist best known for deciphering the power of emotional intelligence for the general public, stands out, however, he has also written books and conducted studies on this important subject.
- The six main types of leadership according to Daniel Goleman are the most widely used classification in different disciplines.
- For example.
- In the business world many managers study their teams to improve their leadership skills.
- So in this article we will discuss it in more detail.
In his book Leadership That Gets Results, Daniel Goleman described six main types of leadership, each based on a component of emotional intelligence, however, what everyone has in common is that the people who develop them get results.
On the other hand, the types of leadership according to Daniel Goleman are not incompatible, on the contrary, the best leaders are able to take elements of each type to adapt to the demands of the moment, in any case, to choose what is most useful for a situation, you must first know them. As Goleman describes in his work, the six main types of leadership are:
Let’s look at each of them
The first type of leadership is based on discipline, managers who follow this model try to maintain discipline above any other value, for this they usually use brief, specific and precise instructions, in general, in addition, the consequences of non-compliance. The command will be harsh and in many cases will attempt to set a precedent, giving a warning to those who are tempted to relax or not follow directions.
This usually leads to the demotion of group members: workers feel that they have no control over their work, that their operational and decision-making capabilities do not exceed that of a machine.
Therefore, this leadership can only be used in situations where it is necessary to act in a very specific way or when there are many organizational problems in the group, for example, during an emergency or during an extremely complex task, where the limits do not leave much room for error.
Democratic leadership follows the idea that it is necessary to take into account the views of the group as a whole to make a decision, which usually involves many meetings, discussions and conferences, so it will be especially useful in cases where the choice of the track is long and where the formation of all members of the group for the proposed objective is similar.
On the other hand, democratic leadership is often used when the team is multidisciplinary and, therefore, it is necessary to combine the different disciplines to carry out the projects, that is, it is necessary to reach agreements on where disciplines are located or overlapped. , so that all parts fit.
The third type of leadership, according to Daniel Goleman, is based on the creation of links between the different members of the group, in this way harmony and collaboration between them is achieved. We are talking about a type of leadership that seeks above all that the human environment is harmonious, knowing that it is a stimulus for workers.
The main difficulty facing this type of leader is the lack of discipline and disorganization, it is also complicated when conflicts arise, because the emotional involvement of the team will be much greater.
Leaders who use this style motivate their subordinates with a clear and vivid vision, they show each one what their role within the team is, the main advantage of this type of leadership is that everyone knows what the objective of the group is, therefore motivation is more present.
Overall, it is one of the most sought after leadership styles today
The role of a facilitator is to define a course, he gives an example, so he always tries to act as if it were a role model, usually used by people who like to feel protagonists, the biggest problem is that it prevents the team from adding something to the final project in addition to replicating a model.
Is this type of leadership particularly effective when the leader is an expert in a given area and the rest of the group has to assume a significant segment?What is expected of them? As an apprenticeship.
The latter type of leadership is to help the members of the group find their strengths and weaknesses, then direct them so that they all develop their full potential, the philosophy behind this is that a good worker will contribute more to the team than one who has not reached their full potential. maximum development.
Each of these types of leadership has its pros and cons, so it is essential to choose at all times what is best for the group and its circumstances, in this sense we believe that developing leadership skills will be useful for both business leaders and those who need to work as a team to achieve a specific goal.