In psychometric terms, validity is a concept that has undergone a long evolutionary process, previously it was believed that a test was valid for what it correlated with (2), there are four types or categories in validity, these are: the validity of the content, the predictive validity, the competitive validity and the validity of the concept.
Next, we’ll explain what competitive validity and conceptual validity are.
- Competitive validity is expressed by assessing the facts present in the test.
- To estimate this type of validity.
- Is the test applied and correlated with the test’s pre-validated measuring instrument?.
This type of validity is similar to predictive validity, however, these two types of validity differ in two respects (1):
The problem with this type of validity is to be able to find evidence that serves as valid and reliable criteria.
The construct is defined as a hypothetical concept as part of the theories that attempt to explain human behavior, with examples being creativity or intelligence.
This type of validity answers the question: “How to psychologically explain the test score. “The answer to this question can be seen as the development of a “mini-theory”. In a psychological test.
Thus, the validity of built is defined as obtaining evidence to support the behavior observed in a test are (some) indicators of what is built (1).
The construction validation process involves (1)
There are several procedures for establishing concept validity (1):
Thus, the validation process, in this case, is in continuous reformulation. The results of studies that we really do not do? We validate? OR? We savor? The complete theory, since you can never prove one? Building? Absolutely.
It can simply be accepted as the best definition of the work we can count on. If the results are negative, there are at least three possible interpretations (1, 3):
The concomitant validity and validity of the built-in light illuminate the validation of a test, so there are other aspects to consider when performing a validation.
These implications should be taken into account in the four types of validation: content validity, predictive validity, competitive validity and concept validity. The psychologist using a test should consider the following (1):
Validity helps us analyze the psychology test. We already know that a test is better the more valid it is (in the absence of other variables). A criterion that unfortunately does not always prevail in research, because there are others that come into play, such as economics or availability.