A program that addresses the most varied topics opens its morning session with sad faces, attitudes of indignation and faces of bewilderment and wonder. Nadia, the sick girl whose father starred in all Spanish television shows, turned out to be a fraudulent show.
Outrage between prominent journalists and channel directors is high, they feel let down and assume the role of victims, perhaps the audience reached a considerable number when the girl appeared on the show, assistant parents, a sick daughter and a charity always give a lot of audience and curiosity, as well as raising awareness of many people to find peace.
- When a macabre event occurs and appears in the press.
- Many people who knew the perpetrator.
- Murderer or rapist ensure that he looked normal and friendly.
- The newspapers are in charge of alerting us that we are surrounded by dangerous people who seem normal.
However, with their faces of formal pain and great staging, they turned out to be in this case “the neighbor who never greeted himself”. This is what we learned from Nadia’s case.
Sometimes we are surrounded by people who can sometimes harm society, even if they seem disguised as a “brave father. “In this case we learn that ignorance grows at the same time as the income of the “media”.
A lot of people are marked as having? By not sharing photos of babies with tumors on social media, declaring that they would terminate a pregnancy in the face of a severe birth defect, saying they do not believe in charity as a means of acquiring true social dignity and that alternative. Therapies, at the very least, seem a little strange. We are classified as skeptical, with no sense of empathy and understanding for many.
Despite this, there is still an important section of the population that would never have made a girl the protagonist of a bewildering spectacle. Consequence of the rise of pseudoscience, the commodization of pain and interest in charity and “gestures of understanding”?face the suffering of others to look like good people, rather than eventually avoiding promoting the opposite.
TV shows with participants who do not know how to differentiate trichothiodystrophy from a terminal illness, nor who have the slightest intention, since they assume that their audience is ignorant enough to never think of doing research on Google.
No one has bothered to question prominent doctors such as Juan Ferrando, of the Hospital del Clenic in Barcelona, or the geneticist Ana Patiao, of the Confica University of Navarra, who confirmed by genetic analysis the tricotiodistrophy of the girl in 2006. media exposure of the case and fundraising for the 11-year-old who undergoes experimental treatment in Houston, who is not aware of its existence.
The father, who wears different mystical spheres around his neck, making sure to be satisfied with this treatment created by NASA scientists, leaves the participants and the presenter, ready to give it his all, even if he himself suffers from pancreatic cancer (of which there is no trace).
After knowing that everyone (including everyone for assuming it wasn’t just them who made this show) were tricked, the TV shows take responsibility for being the one who says he threw a dog out the window because he thought he had a mattress waiting. for him on the ground. . Without the slightest self-criticism, without taking responsibility for the spread of disrecognise, these spaces echo the alleged photos of the girl’s sexual content.
Before discussing the emotional content, they are dedicated to explaining in detail what the girl’s postures were in these photos, how and how they could have been taken, if the girl was naked, if she was high, public contempt is endless. The perverted father and the ignorant mother have already been prosecuted, but they continue to play this game and commit an intrusion into the girl’s honor and intimacy.
Nadia may not have died as soon as many claim, but her privacy was violated by life.
Nadia’s case has taught us a lot, he taught us that parents can be the worst thing that can happen to a girl, no matter how outraged we are, we learn of the hard work of investigating journalists in the face of such a delicate case.
This has taught us that sexual photos of an 11-year-old (known to the public) can continue to conquer the public; that the media is not intended to be rigorous; therapies that are a scam can generate more money than a serious research disease.
Let’s turn on the TV and listen to these details, thinking that Nadia might one day be anyone in our day-to-day life. May the show and the audience justify everything and that the neighbors who always greeted are just a button away from our television control. We can only apologize as spectators of this circus without having filed a complaint.
We can only ask forgiveness from all those parents who fight every day for a fair and effective treatment of their children’s diseases, believing more in justice than in the effectiveness of research, and more in science than in the hypocritical charity of a child. TV show. Forgive them all and especially Nadia. You should never have been through this, and the others should never have let this happen.