Frankenstein syndrome refers to the fear that human creations will turn against themselves, thus destroying humanity. Mary Shelley’s book, published in 1818, recognized this concern from there. “You are my creator, but I am your master Victor Frankenstein at the end of the play, who eventually fails and destroys him.
Frankenstein, a literary character, is considered the monster who inherited only the surname of its creator, and was created from fragments of human bodies, was born against his will, without the uterus that had begged him, but assumed his existence and tried to live in a world that rejected him, hence the name Frankenstein syndrome.
- This syndrome is obviously related to Shelley’s work.
- In which the doctor wanted to behave like a creator.
- Play God.
- His initial aspirations as a doctor strayed.
- So he ended up pursuing goals that went beyond maintaining and taking care of life.
The doctor’s name is today a symbol of science that flees its objectives by walking on uncertain and swampy terrain, which can threaten human beings and the continuity of life as we know it today.
It is no secret to anyone that digital development, genetic manipulation and cloning have progressed exponentially in recent decades, and while society is increasingly familiar with all these advances and developments, it is still difficult to assimilate the continuous changes and opportunities that lie ahead.
The new can lead to rejection, especially when it directly affects human beings, the existence of a technology capable of altering the natural evolution of living beings disgusts many for their ideological beliefs, one of the reasons is that it also creates uncertainty about what might happen to these creations in the future.
The cloning of dolly sheep has opened up to society to debate whether cloning people, if we think about it on a technical level we think yes, it is possible to clone a human being, however, it should be noted that there is also an ethical issue that is very present.
When we talk about human cloning, the ethical debates that may arise become almost endless. The first human embryo cloning experiment generated much rejection by political and religious organizations around the world.
Experimenters have championed scientific progress by ensuring that the idea is not simply to create humans, but that there is a therapeutic purpose in the procedure. Therapeutic cloning is supported by most of the international scientific community, which is convinced that it could be a high potential treatment for chronic diseases such as cancer, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease or diabetes, among others.
Genetics is one of the most advanced sciences of recent years, genetic evolution experts emphasize the need to differentiate genetic manipulation according to the purpose it pursues: the one that takes place with the aim of curing or preventing diseases and the one that aims to “improve human species”.
It is obvious that, like all technology, genetic manipulation is not without risks, however, is it true that the genetic manipulation practiced so far in many species?Including humans, it is almost always designed to improve our quality of life by minimizing risks. The goals are to fight disease, obtain food or products that humans need, or improve scientific knowledge.
Technophobia includes terms feared by some of us, such as cyber warfare, machines that take over our lives, lack of privacy on social media, etc. Fear of change is inherent to the human being; you get used to living in a certain way and suddenly things change or the rules change, but in reality the human being adapts to the changes that are presented to him.
Technological advances are an integral part of our lives today, of course, we must also recognize that these advances are not always perfect, in fact, there are times when the fear of the possibilities that arise is completely justified, for we will never know in the name of who the changes are being made and for what is the new conquered power. However, from this fear to Frankenstein syndrome, there is still a long way to go.